Robin Whisenhunt v. Trudy Hill--Appeal from of County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00310-CV ROBIN WHISENHUNT APPELLANT V. TRUDY HILL APPELLEE ---------- FROM JUSTICE COURT, PRECINCT 6 OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Robin Whisenhunt filed a notice of restricted appeal from a February 8, 2012 default judgment entered against her in Justice of the Peace, Precinct 6, Tarrant County. Because there is no basis upon which a restricted appeal may be brought directly from a justice court to this Court, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. A court of appeals has appellate jurisdiction of all civil cases within its district of which the district or county courts have jurisdiction when the amount in controversy or the judgment rendered exceeds $250, exclusive of interest and costs. Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.220(a) (West Supp. 2012). Appeals from justice courts generally lie either in the county or the district court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.001 (West 2008); see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 574b. Consequently, a justice court judgment cannot be appealed directly to the court of appeals. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.220(a); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.001; Tejas Elevator Co. v. Concord Elevator, Inc., 982 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. App. Dallas 1998, no pet.) (mem. op.). On August 2, 2012, we notified Whisenhunt of our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over her appeal from the judgment signed February 8, 2012, in the justice court and cited Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 51.001. We informed Whisenhunt that her appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before August 13, 2012, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Whisenhunt responded with a letter brief arguing that her restricted appeal was timely filed; she did not, however, point to any statutory provision giving this court jurisdiction over an appeal from a justice court judgment. Even though Whisenhunt s notice of restricted appeal was timely filed, we are without jurisdiction because the restricted appeal is from a justice court judgment. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.220(a); Ingle v. Samuel, No. 12-092 00002-CV, 2009 WL 189095, at *1 (Tex. App. Tyler Jan. 21, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing attempted restricted appeal from justice court judgment); Automania, L.L.C. v. May, No. 03-03-00592-CV, 2004 WL 852275, at *1 (Tex. App. Austin Apr. 22, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same); see also Tejas Elevator Co., 982 S.W.2d at 579 (dismissing appeal from justice court judgment). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. SUE WALKER JUSTICE PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 30, 2012 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
