Frederick D. Pimpton v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 297th District Court of Tarrant County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00287-CR FREDERICK D. PIMPTON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Frederick D. Pimpton appeals from the trial court s order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. In late June 2012, we informed Appellant by letter of our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over his appeal because the order denying his motion does not appear to be an appealable order, and we stated that his appeal could be dismissed unless he or any party filed within ten days a 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have received no response. Because an order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not appealable,2 we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.3 PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: September 20, 2012 2 See Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file petition for writ of mandamus in court of appeals); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App. Waco 2002, pet. dism d). 3 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
