Frank Thomas Pirtz v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3 of Tarrant County

Annotate this Case

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 2-02-482-CR

2-02-483-CR

FRANK THOMAS PIRTZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION // AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant s Motion To Withdraw And Dismiss The Appeal. Although appellant has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, appellant stated at an abatement hearing held in the trial court on August 4, 2003, that he no longer wishes to pursue his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Because the record of that hearing is before us, we suspend rule 42.2(a) s requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL D: DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 2, 2003

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.