Richard Hattox v. Ronnie Blasingame--Appeal from 355th District Court of Hood County

Annotate this Case
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-03-00049-CV

RICHARD HATTOX APPELLANT

V.

RONNIE BLASINGAME APPELLEE

----------
FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION(1) AND JUDGMENT
----------

We have considered "Appellant's Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 17, 2003

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.