Bradley Young v. Selene Finance LP, as Mortgage Servicer for MCLP Asset Company, Inc., The Current Mortgagee Appeal from 457th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00001-CV __________________ BRADLEY YOUNG, Appellant V. SELENE FINANCE LP, AS MORTGAGE SERVICER FOR MCLP ASSET COMPANY, INC., THE CURRENT MORTGAGEE, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23-12-19135-CV __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 29, 2023, Bradley Young filed a notice of appeal in Trial Cause Number 23-12-19135-CV. The notice of appeal complained that on Friday, December 29, 2023, Young had been unable to locate a judge to sign a temporary restraining order to prevent a non-judicial foreclosure sale on Tuesday, January 2, 2024. We notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a final judgment or an appealable order, and we warned the parties that the appeal would 1 be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Court received a response showing a ground for continuing the appeal. Generally, in civil cases appellate courts review only final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An appeal from an interlocutory order may proceed as an accelerated appeal “when allowed by statute[.]” See Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. We granted an extension of time until February 9, 2024, to file a response, but Young failed to file a response or identify a final judgment or a written order from which an appeal is authorized by law. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on March 13, 2024 Opinion Delivered March 14, 2024 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
