Jeremy Steven Clary v. The State of Texas Appeal from 411th District Court of San Jacinto County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00399-CR __________________ JEREMY STEVEN CLARY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 411th District Court San Jacinto County, Texas Trial Cause No. CR13,824 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 2, 2023, the trial court sentenced Jeremy Steven Clary after a jury found Clary guilty of sexual assault of a child in Trial Cause Number CR13,824. After Clary was found guilty and sentenced in Trial Cause Number CR13,824, in a different case in Trial Cause Number CR14,088, on November 16, 2023, the State filed a motion to dismiss and the trial court dismissed an indictment that charged Clary with indecency with a child. On December 8, 2023, Clary filed a pro se notice of appeal from the judgment in Trial Cause Number CR14,088. On February 24, 1 2024, Clary filed an amended notice of appeal that changed the trial cause number in his previous notice of appeal from CR14,088 to CR13,824. A clerical defect in a notice of appeal should not be described as affecting jurisdiction. Few v. State, 230 S.W.3d 184, 189 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). If a notice of appeal mistakenly recites the wrong case number, the appellate court must provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to amend the notice of appeal to correct the information required by Rule 25.2(c). Id. at 190. An appellant may correct a defect in a notice of appeal by filing an amended notice of appeal that relates back to the date the appellant filed the defective notice of appeal. See Tex R. App. P. 25.2(f). But Rule 25.2(f) cannot be used to enlarge the appellate court’s jurisdiction See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court sentenced Clary in Trial Cause Number 13,824 on November 2, 2023. Clary did not file a motion for new trial. To perfect his appeal, Clary had to file a notice of appeal by Monday, December 4, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); see also Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). To obtain an extension of time to file his notice of appeal, Clary had to file the notice of appeal with the trial court within fifteen days of the date the notice was due, and he also had to file a motion for an extension of time with the appellate court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Clary failed to timely request an extension of time to file his notice of appeal. “When a notice of appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day period, the court of 2 appeals lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on April 16, 2024 Opinion Delivered April 17, 2024 Do Not Publish Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
