Marvin Gabriel Holmes v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00390-CR __________________ MARVIN GABRIEL HOLMES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F22-39923 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Acting pro se, Marvin Gabriel Holmes filed a notice of appeal that omitted any reference to a conviction or an appealable order. The Clerk of the Court issued a notice to the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Court received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Neither party responded to the Clerk’s notice. 1 Generally, an appeal may be taken by a defendant in a criminal case only after a final conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (establishing time for appeal by a defendant after a sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court signs an appealable order). In criminal cases, the courts of appeals have jurisdiction only of those appeals authorized by a statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (A defendant’s general right to appeal under Article 44.02 has always been limited to appeal from a final judgment.). A court of appeals lacks appellate jurisdiction to review an order before final judgment unless an interlocutory appeal is expressly provided by statute. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Neither of the parties have shown that the trial court has imposed sentence in open court or signed an order that may be appealed at this time. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on January 30, 2024 Opinion Delivered January 31, 2024 Do Not Publish Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
