In Re Corey Thomas Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00224-CR __________________ IN RE COREY THOMAS __________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23DCCR0272 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, Relator Corey Thomas asks this Court to compel the trial court to hold an examining trial. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 16.01 (“The accused in any felony case shall have the right to an examining trial before indictment in the county having jurisdiction of the offense[.]”). We deny mandamus relief.1 Relator failed to certify that he served a copy of the mandamus petition on the Respondent and the Real Party in Interest. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5. We use Rule 2, however, to look beyond these deficiencies to reach an expeditious result. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. 1 1 To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm and he must show that he seeks to compel a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. See In re State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). “If a party properly files a motion with the trial court in a criminal case, the court has a ministerial duty to rule on the motion within a reasonable time after the motion has been submitted to the court for a ruling or after the party has requested a ruling.” In re Gomez, 602 S.W.3d 71, 73 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, orig. proceeding). The mandamus record must show that the motion was filed and brought to the attention of the trial court for a ruling, and the trial court failed to rule on the motion within a reasonable time after the motion was submitted to the court for a ruling or after the party requested a ruling. Id. The mandamus record must contain a sworn or certified copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of. See Tex. R. App P. 52.3(k)(1). A relator must certify that he has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence in the appendix or record. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j). Relator claims he has been detained in custody without an examining trial since his arrest on May 6, 2023. He fails to mention whether he has been indicted. 2 He fails to mention whether he is represented by counsel in the trial court. He fails to show that he invoked his right to an examining trial at a proper time and in an appropriate manner. He fails to describe his attempts to bring his request for an examining trial to the attention of the trial court. He fails to support his petition with an appendix. He cites section 132.001 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which authorizes a person to use an unsworn declaration in lieu of a sworn declaration, certification, or affidavit, but his declaration in not in the form required by section 132.002. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001. To be effective as a substitute for an affidavit, an unsworn declaration must be made under penalty of perjury, so that the State may prosecute him for perjury if he makes a false statement in the mandamus petition. See id. Relator failed to establish a right to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Submitted on August 1, 2023 Opinion Delivered August 2, 2023 Do Not Publish Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
