Zachary Labarge v. The State of Texas Appeal from 356th District Court of Hardin County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00092-CR __________________ ZACHARY LABARGE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25468 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Zachary Labarge filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment and community supervision order in Trial Cause Number 25468. The District Clerk notified this Court that Labarge did not pay for the clerk’s record. This Court abated Zachary Labarge’s appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the appellant is indigent and entitled to appointment of counsel and whether the appellate record should be furnished without cost. Labarge personally attended the hearing, after which the trial court ruled that Labarge is not 1 indigent and signed an order denying Labarge’s request for appointment of counsel and a free record. Upon receiving the record of the indigency hearing, we notified Labarge that a written motion challenging the trial court’s order was due May 25, 2023. Labarge did not challenge the trial court’s order. On July 24, 2023, we received a supplemental clerk’s record that includes Labarge’s personally signed statement, “I Zachary Labarge no longer want to proceed with the appeal process and move forward with my original probation sentence.” Appellant’s written and personally signed statement that he no longer wants to proceed with his appeal constitutes good cause to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in accordance with Rule 2. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.2(a). The appellant has voluntarily abandoned the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on August 29, 2023 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2023 Do Not Publish Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
