Patricia Massey aka Patricia Myers v. Olivia Rylander and Bridget Williams, Administrators of the Estate of Oliver Williams Appeal from County Court at Law No. 6 of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00057-CV __________________ PATRICIA MASSEY AKA PATRICIA MYERS, Appellant V. OLIVIA RYLANDER AND BRIDGET WILLIAMS, ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF OLIVER WILLIAMS, Appellees __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22-32802 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 17, 2023, the trial court signed an Order Granting Motion to Enforce Rule 11 Agreement, granted immediate possession of property located at 13938 African Hills, Willis, Texas to Olivia Rylander and Bridget Williams, Administrators of the Estate of Oliver Williams, and ordered Patricia Massey aka Patricia Myers to immediately vacate the property. The Order contained stated, “This is a Final Judgment disposing of all issues and all parties, all prior interlocutory 1 orders of the court in this cause are hereby final, and this Judgment is appealable.” After the trial court signed the judgment, Massey filed a notice of appeal. On April 20, 2023, we notified the parties that the record had been filed and the Appellant’s brief would be due on May 22, 2023. On June 2, 2023, we notified the parties that Massey had not filed a brief and that her appeal would be submitted without briefs unless, by June 12, 2023, we received a brief together with a motion to extend the time she is allowed to file a brief. We also warned Massey that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if her appeal was submitted without briefs. On June 28, 2023, we notified the parties that on July 19, 2023, the appeal would be submitted on the record alone without briefs and without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss Massey’s appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on July 19, 2023 Opinion Delivered July 20, 2023 Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
