Russell Thomas Bean v. The State of Texas Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00033-CR NO. 09-23-00034-CR __________________ RUSSELL THOMAS BEAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 21-37100 and 21-37101 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 12, 2022, the trial court sentenced Russell Thomas Bean on separate indictments for abandoning a child, but suspended imposition of the sentences and placed Bean on community supervision. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.041; see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42A.053(a)(1). On January 26, 2023, Bean filed notices of appeal. We questioned whether we had jurisdiction over the appeals. In response, on February 8, 2023, a newly appointed counsel for Bean 1 filed a motion through which Bean requests that the appeals be allowed to proceed. Bean does not claim that he has obtained habeas relief granting him the right to file out-of-time appeals. See generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072; see also Ex parte Hiracheta, 307 S.W.3d 323, 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (“An applicant must file an application for writ of habeas corpus under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 11.072 in the trial court in which community supervision was imposed in order to attack a judgment of conviction ordering community supervision.”). In a criminal case, a timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Here, the notice of appeal was due on January 11, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction if it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, along with a motion for extension of time which is filed with the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 Here, a motion for extension of time was due to be filed no later than January 26, 2023. “When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.” Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 2 APPEALS DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on March 7, 2023 Opinion Delivered March 8, 2023 Do Not Publish Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.