In the Interest of B.C.C. Appeal from 317th District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00001-CV __________________ IN THE INTEREST OF B.C.C. __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-224,292-E __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION D.C. filed a notice of appeal from an order denying a motion to abate. We questioned whether the trial court had signed a final judgment or an order that is appealable as an accelerated appeal.1 D.C. and the Office of the Attorney General filed a response to our request, and both agree the trial court’s order is an interlocutory order that is not appealable as an accelerated appeal. D.C. requests that we retain this matter as an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus, but he has To protect the privacy of the parties, we refer to the child and the parties by their initials only. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002(d). 1 1 not filed a brief that we could consider as a mandamus petition. Under these circumstances, judicial efficiency will be served by dismissing the attempted appeal without reference to the merits and without prejudice to D.C.’s right to seek mandamus relief by filing a Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on February 8, 2023 Opinion Delivered February 9, 2023 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
