David Wayne Evans v. The State of Texas Appeal from 9th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00264-CR __________________ DAVID WAYNE EVANS, Appellant VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 02-08-05575-CR __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION David Wayne Evans was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to thirty-five years of imprisonment after his community supervision was revoked. Evans v. State, No. 10-04-00242-CR, 2005 WL 979390 (Tex. App.—Waco Apr. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Evans filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion for copies of the trial transcript and records. We notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of 1 jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Evans filed a response, but he failed to establish that the trial court’s order is appealable. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review interlocutory or post-conviction orders unless such jurisdiction is expressly granted by law. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). No statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when the request is not presented in conjunction with a timely-filed direct appeal. See Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294-95 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings after final felony convictions. See Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07. We hold that the order from which Evans appeals is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM 2 Submitted on December 29, 2020 Opinion Delivered December 30, 2020 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
