Daniel Pettijohn Wisda v. Hollie Marie Wisda Appeal from 410th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00289-CV ____________________ DANIEL PETTIJOHN WISDA, Appellant V. HOLLIE MARIE WISDA, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 410th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-05-06175 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant, Daniel Pettijohn Wisda, did not file a response. The trial court signed the judgment on March 22, 2018. By filing a motion for new trial within thirty days of the date of the judgment, Wisda extended the time for perfecting his appeal to June 20, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). Wisda filed a notice of appeal on July 30, 2018, but by that date his notice was untimely and 1 outside the period for which we may extend the appellate deadline that applies to Wisda’s case. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1), 26.3. Thus, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED. ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
