Carlton E. Corbin v. Montgomery County, Texas and Vera Belle Corbin Pavlovsky Appeal from 284th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00245-CV ____________________ CARLTON E. CORBIN, Appellant V. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS AND VERA BELLE CORBIN PAVLOVSKY, Appellees _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-02-02471-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Carlton E. Corbin filed a notice of appeal. We notified the parties that information from the District Clerk indicated that no appealable order or judgment had been signed and that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal. In response, Appellant informed the Court that another party filed a motion to continue the hearing on the motion to enter judgment. 1 Generally, appellate courts review only final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The time for perfecting an appeal runs from the date the trial court signs the final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. The trial court has not reduced the judgment to writing. There is no indication that a final judgment is imminent. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. ________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
