In Re Mickey J. Hughes Appeal from 418th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-17-00391-CV _________________ IN RE MICKEY J. HUGHES ________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 09-10-09572-CV ________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In a petition for writ of mandamus, Mickey J. Hughes complains that the trial court failed to properly apply this Court’s mandate in the amended modification order that the trial court signed after we reversed the child support order and remanded the case. See generally In Interest of D.S.H., No. 09-16-00109-CV, 2017 WL 1429198, at *6 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 20, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op). To obtain mandamus relief, Hughes must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 1 The relator has an adequate remedy by appeal if the trial court signs an appealable order. In re Thomas, No. 09-15-00240-CV, 2015 WL 3756834, at *1 (Tex. App.— Beaumont June 16, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Mandamus relief is not available to Hughes because the trial court has signed an appealable final order.1 Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Submitted on November 1, 2017 Opinion Delivered November 2, 2017 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ. 1 If a party makes a bona fide attempt to perfect an appeal but files the wrong document, the party must be provided an opportunity to substitute the correct document. Linwood v. NCNB Tex., 885 S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994). Because the issue is not raised in this mandamus proceeding, we express no opinion on whether Hughes timely made a bona fide attempt to appeal. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.