Tyler LeBlanc v. The State of Texas Appeal from 356th District Court of Hardin County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00439-CR NO. 09-15-00440-CR NO. 09-15-00441-CR ____________________ TYLER LEBLANC, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 22768, 22770, and 22772 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court sentenced Tyler LeBlanc on November 17, 2014. The trial court signed certifications in which the court certified that these are plea-bargained cases and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). LeBlanc filed a notice of appeal on October 30, 2015. We notified the parties that LeBlanc filed his notice of appeal too late to perfect an appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b). The notice of appeal at issue here was filed after LeBlanc’s convictions 1 were final, and LeBlanc’s three convictions are no longer subject to direct appeals. LeBlanc failed to establish that his notice of appeal was timely filed or that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted an out-of-time appeal. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 73. The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Furthermore, we must dismiss the appeals because the trial court’s certifications show the defendant does not have the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). We dismiss the appeals. APPEALS DISMISSED. ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on November 24, 2015 Opinion Delivered November 25, 2015 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.