North American Marine, Inc. v. The Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard Appeal from 284th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00034-CV ____________________ NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC., Appellant V. THE CHARLES HEARD LAW FIRM, PC AND CHARLES HEARD, Appellees _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 14-03-02705 CV ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, North American Marine, Inc., and appellees, The Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard, filed a joint agreed motion to vacate the trial court’s default judgment and to remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The parties represent that the appellant properly and timely perfected this restricted appeal and that reversible error is clearly present on the face of the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 30; see also Ins. Co. of State of Pa. v. Lejeune, 297 1 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009). The parties jointly request that we vacate the trial court’s default judgment, remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings, and order that each party bear its own costs and fees incurred as a result of this restricted appeal. See Wilson v. Am. Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc., No. 01-12-00537-CV, 2012 WL 3234059, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 9, 2012, no pet.). We therefore vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, and order that each party bear its own costs and fees incurred as a result of this restricted appeal. VACATED AND REMANDED. ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on April 8, 2015 Opinion Delivered April 9, 2015 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
