Joseph Bernard Cooper v. The State of Texas Appeal from 258th District Court of Polk County (memorandum opinion by chief justice mckeithen)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00301-CR ____________________ JOSEPH BERNARD COOPER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ___________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23233 ___________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Joseph Bernard Cooper of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assault causing bodily injury. The trial court found that Cooper had two prior felony convictions and sentenced Cooper to seventy-five years in prison for aggravated assault and six months in county jail for misdemeanor assault, to run concurrently. Cooper’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record and concludes Cooper’s appeal is frivolous. 1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Cooper filed a pro se brief in response. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that we need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders briefs or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Rather, we may determine that: (1) “the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error”; or (2) “arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently examined the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record, and we agree that no arguable issues support the appeal. We find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1 AFFIRMED. ______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice Submitted on July 21, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 12, 2015 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ. 1 Cooper may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
