Cody Demal Andrews v. The State of TexasAppeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00460-CR ____________________ CODY DEMAL ANDREWS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11-12881 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Cody Demal Andrews pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to the offense of robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. ยง 29.02 (West 2011). The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, assessed a fine of $500, and placed Andrews on unadjudicated community supervision for ten years. The State filed a motion to revoke community supervision. Andrews pleaded true to violations of his supervision. Finding Andrews violated the terms of his community supervision, the 1 trial court revoked Andrews s supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. Andrews s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel s professional evaluation of the record and concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We granted an extension of time for Andrews to file a pro se response. We received no response from Andrews. We have independently reviewed the clerk s record and reporter s record to determine whether there are arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We have found none. Therefore, it is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief Andrews s appeal. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-28; compare Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511. We affirm the trial court s judgment. AFFIRMED. _________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice Submitted on April 1, 2014 Opinion Delivered May 7, 2014 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
