Christie Hunt Combs v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-10-00545-CR _________________ CHRISTIE HUNT COMBS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 96253 ________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Christie Hunt Combs pled guilty to burglary of a building. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Combs guilty, but deferred further proceedings and placed Combs on community supervision for two years. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Combs s unadjudicated community supervision. Combs pled true to four violations of the conditions of her community supervision. The trial court found that Combs had violated the conditions of 1 her community supervision, found Combs guilty of burglary of a building, and assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility. Combs s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel s professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On January 20, 2011, we granted an extension of time for Combs to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Combs. We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel s conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court s judgment.1 AFFIRMED. ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on April 29, 2011 Opinion Delivered May 11, 2011 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 1 Combs may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
