In Re John E. Collier, Jr.--Appeal from 258th District Court of Polk County (per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-11-00565-CR _________________ IN RE JOHN E. COLLIER, JR. ________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION John E. Collier, Jr. filed a petition for mandamus relief though which he seeks to compel the convicting court to rule on motions filed by Collier after the expiration of the trial court s plenary power over the case. See generally Collier v. State, No. 09-0800505-CR, 2009 WL 2617645, at *1 (Tex. App. Beaumont Aug. 30, 2009, pet. ref d) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication). To obtain mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that he has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. State ex rel. Rosenthal v. Poe, 98 S.W.3d 194, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Generally, the trial court has a duty to rule on a properly and timely filed motion within a reasonable time. See State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). But a trial court does not have a duty to rule on free-floating motions unrelated to currently pending actions. In fact, it has no jurisdiction to rule on a motion when it has no plenary 1 jurisdiction coming from an associated case. In re Cash, No. 06-04-00045-CV, 2004 WL 769473, at *1 (Tex. App. Texarkana Apr. 13, 2004, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Collier has neither shown that he has a clear and indisputable right to have the trial court consider and rule upon his motions at this time, nor has Collier shown that he is presently entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Opinion Delivered November 9, 2011 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.