Gregory Tom Holland v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-07-571 CR
____________________
GREGORY TOM HOLLAND, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 07-00306
MEMORANDUM TO CLERK

You are directed to make the following correction in the opinion dated December 19, 2007: On page 1, in the style of the case, change the trial cause number "95600" to "07-00306."

You will give notice of the correction of the original opinion by sending a copy of corrected page 1, accompanied by this memorandum, to all interested parties who received a copy of the original opinion.

Entered this the 11th day of January, 2008.

PER CURIAM

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-07-571 CR
____________________
GREGORY TOM HOLLAND, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 07-00306
MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 22, 2007, the trial court sentenced Gregory Tom Holland on a conviction for felony theft with sequenced prior felony convictions. Holland filed a notice of appeal on November 6, 2007. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal, and that the defendant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the trial court's certification to the Court of Appeals.

On November 16, 2007, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeal unless the trial court filed an amended certification within thirty days of the date of the notice and made it a part of the appellate record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1. The trial court has not supplemented the record with an amended certification.

Because the record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

__________________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice

 

Opinion Delivered December 19, 2007

Do not publish

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.