Jason Ray Tubbs v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 163rd District Court of Orange County

Annotate this Case
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-05-356 CR
____________________
JASON RAY TUBBS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 163rd District Court
Orange County, Texas
Trial Cause No. B-050107-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Ray Tubbs entered a non-negotiated guilty plea to an indictment for the state jail felony offense of evading arrest. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 38.04(a),(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). The trial court convicted Tubbs and sentenced him to two years of confinement in a state jail facility. The trial court certified that this is not a plea-bargain case and that the defendant has the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Appellate counsel filed a brief that concludes no arguable error is presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On June 8, 2006, Tubbs was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. As there was no plea bargain agreement, we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Jack v. State, 871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). The required admonishments appear in the record. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13 (Vernon Supp. 2006). Tubbs signed a judicial confession. He has not contested the voluntariness of his guilty plea.

We have reviewed the clerk's and the reporter's records, and find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court's judgment is affirmed. (1)

AFFIRMED.

____________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on September 26, 2006

Opinion Delivered October 4, 2006

Do Not Publish

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in the case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.