Clifford Ray Thomas v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 75th District Court of Liberty County

Annotate this Case
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-02-360 CR
____________________
CLIFFORD RAY THOMAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 75th District Court
Liberty County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 24,055
MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Clifford Ray Thomas guilty of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine, in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 481.112 (a),(c) (Vernon 2003). After finding the defendant to be an habitual offender, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

 

Appellate counsel filed a brief that concludes no arguable reversible error is presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On March 6, 2003, Thomas was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. Because the appeal involves the application of well-settled principles of law, we deliver this memorandum opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

We have reviewed the clerk's record and the reporters' record, and find no arguable reversible error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 30, 2003

Opinion Delivered July 16, 2003

Do Not Publish

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.