Brandon Rhodes v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County

Annotate this Case
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-02-484 CR
____________________
BRANDON RHODES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 86438
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brandon Rhodes entered a non-negotiated guilty plea to an indictment for the third degree felony offense of evading detention with the use of a vehicle and as a second offense. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 38.04 (b)(2) (Vernon 2003). The trial court convicted and sentenced Rhodes to eight years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

 

Appellate counsel filed a brief that concludes no arguable error is presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On December 19, 2002, Rhodes was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. Because the appeal involves the application of well-settled principles of law, we deliver this memorandum opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

As there was no plea bargain agreement, we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Jack v. State, 871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). It appears the appellant was duly admonished. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13 (Vernon 1989 & Supp. 2003). Rhodes signed a judicial confession and admitted his guilt in open court. The record does not support an arguable contest of the voluntariness of his guilty plea.

We have reviewed the clerk's and the reporter's records, and find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 26, 2003

Opinion Delivered April 2, 2003

Do Not Publish

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.