In re Bridgit Mennite, MD; Brook Mcvey, PA; Romeo N. Garza III, NP; Leilani Klinger, MD, and Victoria Emergency Associates, LLC Appeal from 407th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00521-CV IN RE Bridgit MENNITE, MD; Brook McVey, PA; Romeo N. Garza III, NP; Leilani Klinger, MD, and Victoria Emergency Associates, LLC Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice 2 Delivered and Filed: August 24, 2022 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED August 15, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed a motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ motion for stay is denied as moot. Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CI-17106, styled Zenaida Potter, Individually, as personal representative of the estate of and on behalf of all wrongful death beneficiaries of Brian Joseph Potter, deceased v. Sound Inpatient Physicians of Texas I, Inc. D/B/A Sound Physicians of Texas; Nathan J. Bernal, MD; Brandon M. Perry, MD; Klever Uleanya, AGACNP; Leann D. Calvin, AGACNP; Sasikanth Nallagatlia, MD; Burton Shaw Jr, MD; Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation D/B/A Christus Santa Hospital - Westover Hills, Bridgit Mennite, MD; Brooke McVey, PA; Romeo N. Garza III, NP; Leilani Klinger, MD; and Victoria Emergency Associates, LLC, pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Aaron Haas presiding. 2 Justice Valenzuela would have requested a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.