In re ARS Specialty Contractors, LLC d/b/a GARREN Construction, Elizabeth Yetman Chavez, and Ramiro Chavez Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00134-CV IN RE ARS SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS, LLC d/b/a Garren Construction, Elizabeth Yetman Chavez, and Ramiro Chavez, Relators Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 7, 2022 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On March 4, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency stay of the arbitrator’s scheduling order for the arbitration proceedings. On March 17, 2022, we granted relators’ emergency motion and stayed all deadlines and settings in the arbitrator’s scheduling order pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus. We also requested the respondent and real parties in interest file a response to the petition. On April 12, 2022, the real parties in interest filed a response. After considering the petition, the response, and the record, we conclude relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI20699, styled ARS Specialty Contractors, LLC d/b/a Garren Construction v. Central Texas Express Metalwork, LLC d/b/a Express Contracting and Kara Clayton, which was consolidated with Cause No. 2021CI121753, styled Central Texas Express Metalwork, LLC d/b/a Express Contracting v. ARS Specialty Contractors, LLC d/b/a Garren Construction, Elizabeth Yetman Chavez, and Ramiro Chavez, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding. 1 04-22-00134-CV writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on March 17, 2022 is lifted. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.