In re Douglas C. Glenewinkel and Ward A. Glenewinkel Appeal from 456th District Court of Guadalupe County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00299-CV IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel, Relator(s) Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 29, 2021 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 26, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief, which this court granted on July 29, 2021. The real parties in interest filed a response to which relators replied. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-0921-CV-E, styled Douglas C. Glenewinkel and Ward. A. Glenewinkel v. Marvin W. Kraft, Jr., Jeffrey Marvin Kraft and Craig W. Hall, pending in the 456th District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Heather H. Wright presiding. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.