In re Olga Maria Narro and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola Appeal from 63rd Judicial District Court of Val Verde County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00081-CV IN RE Olga Maria NARRO and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola, Relators Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 14, 2021 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 2 PER CURIAM This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 34885, styled In re J.E.N., pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas, the Honorable Roland C. Andrade presiding. 2 Because we agree with relators that the circumstances do not require an abatement under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2, we also deny the Real Parties’ motion to abate. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.