In re Isidro Ramos, III Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00466-CR IN RE Isidro RAMOS, III Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 21, 2020 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT On September 17, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s refusal to rule on his motion for DNA testing. Relator also filed a motion for leave to file his petition. On October 9, 2020, the respondent filed a response containing copies of its October 9, 2020 orders (1) denying relator’s request for appointment of counsel pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 64 and (2) denying relator’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing. Because the trial court has ruled on relator’s pending motions, relator has now received the relief requested. We, therefore, dismiss relator’s petition as moot. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CR-9685, styled State of Texas v. Isidro Ramos, III, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melissa Skinner presiding. 1 04-20-00466-CR We deny as moot relator’s request to file a petition for writ of mandamus because leave is not required to file a petition in an intermediate appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1; In re Medina, 04-19-00041-CR, 2019 WL 360534, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 30, 2019, no pet.). PER CURIAM Do not publish -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
