John Stewart Mueller v. The State of Texas Appeal from 198th Judicial District Court of Bandera County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00665-CR John Stewart MUELLER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-009 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 27, 2019 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 30, 2019, to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Thereafter, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment of conviction. “With certain exceptions . . ., this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction.” Zamarripa v. State, No. 04-16-00274-CR, 2016 WL 3085932, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 1, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02); accord McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.— 04-19-00665-CR Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (“Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction.”). On October 22, 2019, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to the order. Because there is no final judgment of conviction and because appellant has not specified an exception to the general rule that we may consider an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961) (dismissing appeal where the judgment in the record was not a judgment of conviction); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161 (dismissing interlocutory appeal from an order denying a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence for lack of jurisdiction). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.