Richard A Contreras the owner heir to Los Ojuelos Ranch, Abst.# 1393-Sur.# 592, Ind. v. Enrique Benavides, et. al., Leroy & Lavada Jones, Jean Shell, Trust, Huisache Land & Minerals, Ltd., Guillermo Salinas & CAAMR Invest Janice Hinds-Ind., Los Ojuelos Ranch Partnership, Diana Peacock, Mgr., Killam Ranch Properties, Ltd. Appeal from 406th Judicial District Court of Webb County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00406-CV Richard A. CONTRERAS, the owner heir to Los Ojuelos Ranch, Abst. #1393-Sur. #592, Ind.; Appellant v. Enrique BENAVIDES, et. al.; Leroy & Lavada Jones; Jean Shell, Trust; Huisache Land & Minerals, Ltd.; Guillermo Salinas & CAAMR Invest Janice Hinds-Ind.; Los Ojuelos Ranch Partnership; Diana Peacock, Mgr.; Killam Ranch Properties, Ltd.; Appellees From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CV7002684-D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 14, 2019 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On June 24, 2019, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. In response, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before July 8, 2019, that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant was entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We warned that if appellant failed to file an appropriate response within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. 04-19-00406-CV See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if clerk’s record is not filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court). Appellant failed to file an appropriate response. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
