Dianne Schrab v. Andrew Rossi Appeal from 229th Judicial District Court of Jim Hogg County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00281-CV Dianne SCHRAB, Appellant v. Andrew ROSSI, Appellee From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas Trial Court No. CC-17-154 Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 22, 2019 PETITION DENIED, DISMISSED Dianne Schrab has filed a petition for permissive appeal. She alleges the trial court erred by denying a motion she filed in a suit for dissolution of a common law marriage. See TEX. FAM. CODE §§ 6.001–.008 (providing substantive grounds for dissolution of marriage). The petition for permissive appeal is denied. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d), (e) (providing permissive appeal procedure “does not apply to an action brought under the Family Code.”). PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.