Sonja Campbell v. David Campbell Appeal from County Court At Law No. 10 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00247-CV Sonja CAMPBELL, Appellant v. David CAMPBELL, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CV00288 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 14, 2019 DISMISSED On May 28, 2019, we ordered appellant to clarify by June 7, 2019, which judgment or order appellant wishes to appeal from. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(2). The Clerk of Court sent appellant a copy of our order by first class mail, but the letter was returned to our court as undeliverable. After the letter was returned, a deputy clerk of our court sent appellant an electronic message to the email address appellant had provided to us when she filed her appeal; the message, however, was undeliverable. A deputy clerk also called the phone number appellant had provided to us when she filed her appeal, and the deputy clerk left a voicemail message requesting that 04-19-00247-CV appellant call our court and update her email address and phone number with us. Appellant has not called our court in response. On June 25, 2019, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by July 10, 2019, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with a court order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. We sent a copy of our July 10, 2019 order to appellant by first class mail and email, but our letter and electronic message were undeliverable. Appellant has not responded to our July 10, 2019 order or otherwise prosecuted her appeal since we issued our first order on May 28, 2019. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution and for appellant’s failure to comply with a court order. See id. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.