In the Interest of K.R., a Child Appeal from 407th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00243-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.R., a Child From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-PA-00026 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 2, 2019 AFFIRMED This is an appeal from the trial court’s Order of Termination in which the trial court terminated appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief and motion to withdraw, concluding the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief, informed appellant of his right to review the record, and advised appellant of his right to file a pro se brief. The State waived its right to file an appellee’s brief unless appellant filed a pro se brief. Appellant requested and was provided a copy of the record, but appellant did not file a pro se brief. 04-19-00243-CV After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no writ). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because it does not show good cause for withdrawal. See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (holding “good cause” for withdrawal does not exist merely because counsel states she is unable to effectively communicate with the client and believes the appeal is frivolous). Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.