Travis Crow, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft v. Heddie Knappick Lookadoo, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller Appeal from 218th Judicial District Court of La Salle County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00338-CV Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft, Appellants v. Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller, Appellees From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-10-00188-CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice (not participating) Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2019 DISMISSED On August 29, 2018, this court issued its opinion and judgment in this appeal. On September 12, 2018, appellants filed a motion for rehearing, which was denied on September 28, 2018. On October 15, 2018, appellants filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. On October 26, 2018, before this court ruled on appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration, the parties filed a joint motion to abate this appeal for the purpose of mediation, which was granted on November 1, 2018. On July 25, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Lift Abatement and Dismiss Appeal 04-17-00338-CV with Prejudice in which the parties state they have fully settled all matters and no longer wish to pursue this appeal. The parties’ joint motion does not request that we withdraw our previouslyissued opinion. We reinstate this appeal on the docket of this court. We withdraw our judgment issued on August 29, 2018, grant the parties’ joint motion, and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In dismissing this appeal, our opinion issued on August 29, 2018, will not be withdrawn. See id. 42.1(c). Because the parties’ joint motion does not address the assessment of costs, the costs of this appeal are taxed against appellants. See id. 43.4. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
