Adobe Title, LLC v. Bruce Clem and TX New Life Investments, LLC, MK Solutions, LLC. Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00476-CV ADOBE TITLE, LLC, Appellant v. Bruce CLEM and TX New Life Investments, LLC, MK Solutions, LLC, Appellees From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CI10950 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 16, 2017 APPEAL DISMISSED A filing fee of $205.00 was due July 25, 2017 when appellant filed its notice of appeal, but it was not paid. See Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged In the Supreme Court, In Civil Cases In the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Misc. Docket No. 159158, Aug. 28, 2015). The clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency in a letter dated July 25, 2017, and directed appellant to pay the fee no later than August 7, 2017. The letter cautioned appellant that if it failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. In an August 1, 2017 order directing appellant to designate and pay 04-17-00476-CV for the reporter’s record, we reminded appellant of the August 7 deadline, and again cautioned appellant that if it failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay— at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Because appellant has neither paid the fee nor responded to our orders, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.