In the Matter of S.O.W. Appeal from 386th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00067-CV IN THE MATTER OF S.O.W. From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1994-JUV-02115 W1 Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2017 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant was a juvenile who was certified to be tried as an adult for capital murder. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.02 (West 2014). Appellant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment on November 12, 1996. Appellant appealed his conviction and this court affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion issued on May 20, 1998. See Williams v. State, 974 S.W.2d 324 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 908 (1999). Appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has authority to grant post-conviction release from confinement for persons with a final felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, 04-17-00067-CV §§ 3, 5; Hoang v. State, 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re Stone, 26 S.W.3d 568, 569 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). This Court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a post-conviction petition for habeas corpus relief in a felony case. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). While the procedures outlined in article 11.07 do not apply to dispositions in juvenile proceedings, here S.O.W.’s application for habeas corpus relief arises from his conviction in a criminal district court where he was certified to stand trial as an adult. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Ex parte Lauderdale, No. 04-17-00063-CV, 2017 WL 1161171, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 29, 2017, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Criminal proceedings against a juvenile certified to stand trial as an adult are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, and post-conviction habeas proceedings are included. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.02(h) (West 2014); Ex parte Lauderdale, 2017 WL 1161171, at *1. Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); see also Ex parte Lauderdale, 2017 WL 1161171, at *1. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
