In the Interest of C.R-A.A., a Child Appeal from 216th Judicial District Court of Kerr County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00587-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.R-A.A., a Child From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 15189A The Honorable Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2016 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant A.A. filed a notice of appeal from an associate judge’s recommendation to terminate her parental rights to her child, C.R.-A.A. Appellant timely filed a request for a de novo hearing. Based upon representation of counsel in a letter filed with this court, appellant filed her notice of appeal in an interest of caution because the trial court had not set a de novo hearing. The trial court has now scheduled a de novo hearing for November 18, 2016. Associate judges do not have the power to render final judgment outside the context of certain limited exceptions listed in section 201.007 of the Family Code. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.007(a)(14)(West 2014); Chacon v. Chacon, 222 S.W.3d 909, 913 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2007, no pet.). None of the exceptions listed in section 201.007 apply to this case. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.007(a)(14). Unless authorized by section 201.007, an associate judge’s 04-16-00587-CV proposed order or recommendation has only temporary effect, pending appeal to the referring trial court. See id. § 201.013; Graham v. Graham, 414 S.W.3d 800, 801 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no pet.). When a notice of appeal of an associate judge’s recommendation is properly and timely filed, the referring court must hold a de novo hearing. Id. § 201.015 (West Supp. 2016); Attorney General of Tex. v. Orr, 989 S.W.2d 464, 469 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.). Consequently, an associate judge’s recommendation is not a final, appealable order when a request for a de novo hearing is timely filed. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.015, 201.016; Graham, 414 S.W.3d at 801. Because appellant timely filed a request for a de novo hearing, appellant’s notice of appeal is premature, as there is no final judgment in this cause from which to appeal. For this reason, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion to abate the appeal is DENIED. Following rendition of a final judgment or order adopting the associate judge’s recommendation, any appealing party must file a new notice of appeal. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
