Jose Roberto Obregon v. The State of Texas Appeal from 49th Judicial District Court of Webb County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00149-CR Jose Roberto OBREGON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR0781-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2016 DISMISSED Jose Roberto Obregon entered into a plea bargain with the State. The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Obregon does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). 04-16-00149-CR On April 8, 2016, we ordered Obregon to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed under Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (requiring us to must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”). On April 29, 2016, we granted Obregon’s motion for an extension of time to obtain an amended certification. We advised him that this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended certification showing he had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record by May 29, 2016. No such amended certification has been made part of the appellate record. We must therefore dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.