Larry Dean Davis v. Ann-Marie Roberts-Davis Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00409-CV Larry Dean DAVIS, Appellant v. Ann-Marie ROBERTS-DAVIS, Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-10500 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 2, 2015 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant Larry Dean Davis filed a notice of appeal and an affidavit of indigence for this appeal. Appellant’s indigence was contested, and the trial court sustained the contest. Thus, Appellant was required to pay $195.00 in filing fees to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 1 Appellant did not timely pay the required fees. Accordingly, when the fees remained unpaid, on August 5, 1 See also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b)(1) (filing fee $100.00) (West Supp. 2015); id. §§ 51.0051, .208 (additional fee $50.00); id. § 51.851(b) (electronic filing fee $20.00); id. § 51.941(a) (services for indigents fee $25.00); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07–9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B.l.(a). 04-15-00409-CV 2015, this court ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court not later than August 17, 2015, that the filing fees have been paid. See id. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond as ordered, the appeal could be dismissed. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C., No. 04-05-00532-CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). To date, Appellant has not paid the fees or filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.