In the Matter of the Marriage of A.L.F.L. and K.L.L., and In the Interest of K.A.F.L., A Child Appeal from 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00364-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF A.L.F.L. and K.L.L. and In the Interest of K.A.F.L., a Child From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-02421 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 29, 2015 DISMISSED AS MOOT This is an appeal from a trial court’s order denying a plea to the jurisdiction in a same-sex divorce matter. On June 30, 2015, we rendered an order that, among other things, ordered appellant to show cause why we should not dismiss this appeal as moot in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. See Nos. 14-556, 14-574, 14-562, & 14-571, __ U.S. __ (June 26, 2015). On July 16, 2015, appellant filed a response to our order and a motion to dismiss. Appellant seems to agree the appeal is moot in light of the Obergefell decision. “A case becomes moot if, since the time of filing, there has ceased to exist a justiciable controversy between 1 The Honorable Barbara Nellermoe retired from the bench effective December 31, 2014. She signed the orders that are the subject of this appeal prior to her retirement. 04-14-00364-CV the parties — that is, if the issues presented are no longer ‘live,’ or if the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012); see also Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See id. In light of our decision to dismiss the appeal as moot, appellant’s motion to dismiss is moot, as is the motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction filed by appellees on June 13, 2014, which was ordered carried with the case. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
