Williamsburg Care Company L.P. d/b/a Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Sylvia Soto, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Narcisa Dimas, Deceased, Ruby Buentello, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Manuel Riojas Munoz, Deceased, and Adela Barboza, Individually Appeal from 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00822-CV WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY L.P. d/b/a Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare, Appellant v. Sylvia SOTO, Individually and as Representative of, Deceased, , Individually and as e Sylvia SOTO, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Narcisa Dimas, Deceased, Ruby Buentello, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Manuel Riojas Munoz, Deceased, and Adela Barboza, Individually, Appellees From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-CI-05792 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 29, 2015 DISMISSED On December 9, 2013, we stayed the trial court proceeding in Trial Court No. 2013-CI05792. On March 4, 2014, we abated this appeal. On July 1, 2015, the parties filed an Agreed, Joint Motion to Reinstate, to Lift Stay, and to Dismiss Appeal. In their motion, the parties state that they have settled the dispute in this appeal and that under the terms of the settlement, various actions need to be taken in the trial court. Therefore, the parties request that we reinstate the appeal, lift the stay of trial court proceedings, and dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 04-13-00822-CV Procedure 42. We grant the parties’ agreed motion, reinstate this appeal on the docket of this court, lift the stay of trial court proceedings in Trial Court No. 2013-CI-05792, and dismiss this appeal. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
