Otto Ray Kietzman v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00432-CR Otto Ray KIETZMAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013W0631 Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2014 AFFIRMED Otto Ray Kietzman appeals from an order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus challenging his extradition to Alabama. Kietzman’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he examines the record and discusses potential issues but ultimately concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that Kietzman was provided with copies of the brief and the motion to withdraw, and was further informed of his right to review the record 04-14-00432-CR and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). Kietzman has not filed a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we agree that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Kietzman wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. Karen Angelini, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
