Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth V. Thrasher Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00144-CV Sandra Y. ESPINOZA, Appellant v. Ruth V. Ruth V. THRASHER, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 391870 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2014 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant’s brief was due on October 9, 2014. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Therefore, on November 19, 2014, we ordered appellant to file, on or before December 1, 2014, her appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if appellant failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply 04-14-00144-CV with a court order). Appellant has not filed any response to our order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
