Denise McVea and Auris Project, Inc. v. James Michael Kissler Appeal from 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00803-CV Denise MCVEA, Appellant v. James Michael James Michael KISSLER, Appellee From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-CI-14927 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2014 DISMISSED On February 12, 2014, this appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because appellant failed to respond to this court s order dated January 16, 2014. On March 18, 2014, this court granted a motion for rehearing, reinstating this appeal on the docket of the court. Appellant s brief was due to be filed on April 21, 2014. On April 17, 2014, appellant requested an extension of time to file her brief because she had requested two additional reporter s records. Appellant s motion was granted, and the deadline for filing her brief was extended to June 2, 2014. On May 27, 2014, appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file her brief. The motion 04-13-00803-CV was granted, extending the deadline to July 2, 2014. This court s order stated, Further requests for extensions will be disfavored. On July 2, 2014, appellant filed a motion to abate appeal and remand for a hearing on appellant s out-of-time motion for new trial. On July 9, 2014, this court issued an order denying appellant s motion and ordering appellant s brief to be filed no later than July 18, 2014. The order stated, NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED. If appellant s brief is not filed by July 18, 2014, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to comply with this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). No appellant s brief has been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See id. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.