In re Kevin RogersAppeal from County Court at Law No. 13 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00489-CR IN RE Kevin ROGERS Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2013 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator Kevin Rogers filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus on July 22, 2013, complaining of the trial court s failure to rule on various motions pending in his criminal case. Relator has been appointed trial counsel to represent him in connection with the criminal charges pending against him. We conclude that any original proceeding on the issue presented should be presented by relator s trial counsel. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 420360, styled The State of Texas v. Kevin Rogers, pending in the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez presiding. 04-13-00489-CR 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.