Donna Garcia v. The State of TexasAppeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00846-CR Donna GARCIA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR6592W Angus McGinty, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 3, 2013 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court imposed or suspended sentence on August 15, 2012. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed September 14, 2012. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on September 29, 2012. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant did not file a notice of appeal, but she filed a motion for extension of time on December 17, 2012. Because it appeared this court lacked jurisdiction over this appeal, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why the appeal should not be dismissed. On March 21, 2013, appellant s attorney filed a Motion for 04-12-00846-CR Leave of Court to Late File Notice of Appeal, asserting appellant was pro se and, at the time her notice of appeal was due, not represented by effective counsel. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07). This appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Do not publish -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.