Edwin Charles New v. The State of TexasAppeal from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00743-CR Edwin Charles NEW, Appellant v. The of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR0691 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 13, 2013 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED Edwin Charles New was found guilty of felony prostitution by a jury, and the trial court sentenced New to twenty months incarceration in state jail and fined him $1,500. In addition, the trial court imposed court costs on New, including reimbursement of attorney s fees. New s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he raises no arguable points of error and concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 04-12-00743-CR 1969). New was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. New has not filed a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). However, we also conclude the judgment assessing costs and attorney s fees against New should be modified. The judgment assesses Court Costs: $334.00 PLUS ATTY FEES against New. The bill of cost filed in a supplemental clerk s record includes $1,612.50 in courtappointed attorney s fees. The record reflects that attorney Michael Collins was appointed by the trial court in April 2012 to represent New in this matter, and that Collins represented New through the sentencing phase. After trial, appellant filed a motion for appointment of counsel, asserting that he is wholly destitute of means to provide counsel. Thereafter, the trial court appointed new counsel pursuant to article 26.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure to represent New on appeal. A defendant who is determined by the court to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the remainder of the proceedings in the case unless a material change in the defendant s financial circumstances occurs. Cates v. State, 402 S.W.3d 250, 251 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (quoting TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2012)). The record in this case provides no factual basis for a determination that New s financial circumstances changed after April 2012 or that he is able to pay attorney s fees. See Cates, 402 S.W.3d at 252. We therefore modify the judgment of the trial court to delete the requirement that New repay the costs of courtappointed counsel, assessed at $1,612.50, as reflected in the Bexar County District Clerk s bill of cost. We affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified, and we grant the motion to withdraw filed by New s counsel. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-27; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 -2- 04-12-00743-CR (Tex. App. San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). 1 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Do not publish 1 No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should New wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
